Current:Home > ContactMcKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales -Dynamic Wealth Bridge
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
View
Date:2025-04-14 13:33:10
Global consulting firm McKinsey & Company agreed Friday to pay $650 million to resolve criminal and civil investigations into the advice it provided to opioids manufacturer Purdue Pharma.
As part of the agreement, McKinsey admitted in a court filing that it chose to continue working with Purdue Pharma to improve sales of OxyContin despite knowing the risks of the addictive opioid. McKinsey was paid more than $93 million by Purdue Pharma across 75 engagements from 2004 to 2019.
The court filing includes a host of admissions by McKinsey, including that – after being retained by Purdue Pharma in 2013 to do a rapid assessment of OxyContin's performance – it said the drug manufacturer's organizational mindset and culture would need to evolve in order to "turbocharge" its sales.
OxyContin, a painkiller, spurred an epidemic of opioid addiction. More than 100,000 Americans have been dying annually in recent years from drug overdoses, and 75% of those deaths involved opioids, according to the National Institutes of Health.
More:These two moms lost sons to opioids. Now they’re on opposite sides at the Supreme Court.
Holiday deals:Shop this season’s top products and sales curated by our editors.
The Justice Department charged McKinsey's U.S. branch with knowingly destroying records to obstruct an investigation and with conspiring with Purdue Pharma to help misbrand prescription drugs. The drugs were marketed to prescribers who were writing prescriptions for unsafe, ineffective, and medically unnecessary uses, according to the charges.
The government won't move forward on those charges if McKinsey meets its responsibilities under the agreement.
The agreement also resolves McKinsey's civil liability for allegedly violating the False Claims Act by causing Purdue Pharma to submit false claims to federal healthcare programs for medically unnecessary prescriptions of OxyContin.
In a statement provided to USA TODAY, McKinsey said it is "deeply sorry" for its service to the drug maker.
"We should have appreciated the harm opioids were causing in our society and we should not have undertaken sales and marketing work for Purdue Pharma," McKinsey said. "This terrible public health crisis and our past work for opioid manufacturers will always be a source of profound regret for our firm."
In addition to paying $650 million, McKinsey agreed it won't do any work related to selling controlled substances for five years.
More:Supreme Court throws out multi-billion dollar settlement with Purdue over opioid crisis
In June, the Supreme Court threw out a major bankruptcy settlement for Purdue Pharma that had shielded the Sackler family behind the company's drug marketing from future damages. The settlement would have paid $6 billion to victims, but also would have prevented people who hadn't agreed to the settlement from suing the Sacklers down the line.
A bankruptcy judge had approved the settlement in 2021, after Purdue Pharma filed for bankruptcy to address debts that largely came from thousands of lawsuits tied to its OxyContin business. The financial award would have been given to creditors that included local governments, individual victims, and hospitals.
The Friday agreement is just the latest in a series of legal developments tied to McKinsey's role in the opioid epidemic.
The company reached a $573 million settlement in 2021 with 47 states, Washington, D.C., and five U.S. territories, and agreed to pay school districts $23 million to help with harms and financial burdens resulting from the opioid crisis.
Contributing: Bart Jansen and Maureen Groppe
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (47)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- How Shein became a fast-fashion behemoth
- How photographing action figures healed my inner child
- Ocean Protection Around Hawaiian Islands Boosts Far-Flung ‘Ahi Populations
- Average rate on 30
- Melanie Griffith Covers Up Antonio Banderas Tattoo With Tribute to Dakota Johnson and Family
- Amazon Prime Day 2023: Fashion Deals Under $50 From Levi's, New Balance, The Drop & More
- For the Third Time, Black Residents in Corpus Christi’s Hillcrest Neighborhood File a Civil Rights Complaint to Fend Off Polluting Infrastructure
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Las Vegas just unveiled its new $2.3 billion spherical entertainment venue
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Ariana Madix Is Making Her Love Island USA Debut Alongside These Season 5 Singles
- Soaring West Virginia Electricity Prices Trigger Standoff Over the State’s Devotion to Coal Power
- The black market endangered this frog. Can the free market save it?
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2023: The Icons' Guide to the Best Early Access Deals
- Lawyers Press International Court to Investigate a ‘Network’ Committing Crimes Against Humanity in Brazil’s Amazon
- REI fostered a progressive reputation. Then its workers began to unionize
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
How Shein became a fast-fashion behemoth
Project Runway All Stars' Rami Kashou on His Iconic Designs, Dressing Literal Royalty & More
Scientists say new epoch marked by human impact — the Anthropocene — began in 1950s
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
What the Supreme Court's rejection of student loan relief means for borrowers
Outnumbered: In Rural Ohio, Two Supporters of Solar Power Step Into a Roomful of Opposition
The US Forest Service Planned to Increase Burning to Prevent Wildfires. Will a Pause on Prescribed Fire Instead Bring More Delays?